What's the biggest fundraising mistake you made early?

Taking capital from wrong investors. Mistook smart people for good fit. Learned: investor fit matters more than smart. Find investors aligned with your vision, not just capital.

How would you have negotiated term sheets differently?

More aggressively on liquidation preference and anti-dilution. Thought I didn't have use—wrong. Every founder has use: their decision to continue or walk. Used it better in second company.

Would you have done fewer or more fundraising rounds?

Fewer rounds, bigger checks. Fundraising is distraction. Each round costs 2-3 months. I'd have raised larger seed, skipped bridge, done Series A once. Less capital-raising, more product.

How much does founder age/experience matter in fundraising?

Massive at young age, less later. At 25, I struggled to be taken seriously. At 35, investors call me. But: young founders with conviction and traction beat older founders without either.

What advice would change your trajectory?

Hire great people faster. Fundraising matters 20%, execution matters 80%. Obsess over product-market fit, not valuation. Once product is right, capital is easy. I spent too much time pitching, not enough building.

← Fundraising Hub

Guide Raising Capital

What I'd Tell My 25-Year-Old Self About Raising Money (And What I Got Wrong)

You're about to spend the next 25 years of your life raising capital. Not continuously—there will be years without a raise, years building in quiet. But capital will be a constant vocabulary in your

By Lech Kaniuk April 2026 22 min

What I’d Tell My 25-Year-Old Self About Raising Money (And What I Got Wrong)

Quick answer: Fundraising is easier than you think and harder than you expect. Easier because capital exists — you just need to find the right people. Harder because rejection is constant, relationships matter more than pitch, and psychology is 80% of the game. Pick problems you’re willing to debug for 10 years. Choose co-founders more carefully than investors. Build before you fundraise.

Dear 25-year-old Lech,

You’re about to spend the next 25 years of your life raising capital. Not continuously—there will be years without a raise, years building in quiet. But capital will be a constant vocabulary in your life. Investors will become friends, then adversaries, then friends again. Term sheets will feel personal even when they’re not. Rejections will sting. Wins will feel simultaneously hollow and triumphant.

I’m writing this from 2026, looking back at the person you were in 2001, when you thought raising money was about having the best idea and the right connections. I want to tell you what actually matters. More importantly, I want to tell you what you’ll get wrong, because getting it wrong is often how you learn it right.

You don’t know this yet, but you’re going to raise capital across two decades, across three countries, across boom and crash and boom again. You’re going to sell a company (iTaxi). You’re going to fail. You’re going to become an angel investor yourself and understand the game from the other side. You’re going to write a book called “Anioł w Piekle” (Angel in Hell) partly because you need to understand your own scars, and partly because other founders need to know they’re not alone in getting it wrong.

So here are ten lessons. Some of them you’ll learn by doing. Some of them you’ll learn by failing. Some of them you won’t believe until you’ve lived them. That’s okay. The living is the point.

Lesson 1: Raising Money Is Easier Than Building a Business. Don’t Confuse Them.

This is the first trap, and you’ll fall into it immediately.

You’ll get an email from an investor who’s interested. Your heart will race. You’ll feel like you’ve won. You’ll spend two weeks preparing for meetings, refining your pitch, practicing your story. You’ll close a round and feel like you’ve accomplished something monumental.

But here’s what you’ll learn, usually at 2 AM in month three after closing: raising money is the easy part. Building a business is impossible.

Raising $100K is about convincing 5-10 people that you might be able to do something hard. Building a product that $100K can sustain for long enough to prove you can actually do that hard thing—that’s the real work. And it’s harder than the pitch.

The mistake you’ll make: You’ll treat fundraising like the win condition. Close the round, celebrate, feel successful. Then reality hits: you have 18 months of runway and your KPIs aren’t moving the way you projected. You’re not building as fast as you promised. The customer traction you promised is uncertain. And suddenly the win feels hollow because the building part is exposing all the ways your confidence was unwarranted.

What you should actually do: Treat fundraising as a scheduling event, not a success event. “We raised money” should feel like “We scheduled the next 12-18 months.” The actual win condition is “We built something that customers want and we can sustain it.” Fundraising gets you the runway to find that win condition. It’s not the win itself.

The best founders I’ve backed as an angel investor are the ones who raise because they have to, not because they want to. They have one eye on the round and the other on customer growth. They’d rather be building than pitching. That’s the mindset to build now, while you still think the pitch is the hard part.

Lesson 2: Investors Are Not Smarter Than You. But They Have More Data.

Around year five of your first venture, you’ll be in a board meeting and an investor will ask you a question you don’t know the answer to. You’ll feel stupid. You’ll think, “This person has seen 100 companies. They must know something I don’t.”

That thought will haunt you for a decade.

Here’s the truth: investors are not smarter than you. They’re not better operators than you. Most of them have never built a company that shipped a product and proved product-market fit. They’ve read about it. They’ve invested in it. But they haven’t lived the 3 AM debugging sessions or the customer who becomes your co-founder because they believe in your vision.

What investors have is pattern recognition at scale. They’ve seen 50 SaaS companies raise Series A. They know which metrics matter. They know which pivots fail and which succeed. They know how to read a cap table and predict dilution scenarios. They know how founders behave under pressure.

That’s not smarter. That’s repetition.

You have something they don’t: you have the product in your hands. You have the customers. You have the context that they can only approximate. You can learn their pattern language, but they can’t replicate your operational reality.

The mistake you’ll make: You’ll defer to investor judgment because they’ve seen more. You’ll accept their opinion on product direction when you know your customers better. You’ll take “I’ve seen this before and it doesn’t work” as a veto, when what they mean is “I’ve seen similar patterns and they usually don’t work.” Those are different things.

What you should actually do: Respect investor experience with data, not as prophecy. When an investor says, “CAC payback should be under 12 months for SaaS,” they’re sharing a pattern. When they say, “Your unit economics won’t work,” dig deeper. Ask them what assumptions they’re using. Compare their assumptions to your data. Sometimes they’re right. Sometimes they’re working from outdated market conditions. Sometimes they’re wrong.

The founders who raise the most capital and stay independent longest are the ones who listen to investors, learn from them, but ultimately trust their own judgment. You’ll do this well twice and fail to do it once. The failure will teach you more than the successes.

Lesson 3: Your Network Matters More Than Your Idea.

You’ll meet thousands of founders. Thousands. In coffee shops, at pitch competitions, at accelerators, in back channels.

The ones who raise capital consistently are not the ones with the best ideas. They’re not the ones with the most impressive prior exits. They’re the ones with the most credible introductions.

Here’s what you’ll learn in year three: an idea without a network is a nice thought. An idea with a network is a fundraise. An okay idea with a network is a company. A great idea with no network is a hobby.

The mistake you’ll make: You’ll invest in your product when you should be investing in your network. You’ll assume that if you build something great, capital will find you. Sometimes it will. Mostly it won’t. The default state of great products is obscurity.

Every founder who introduced you well—who said to an investor, “You should meet Lech, he’s building something in ride-sharing in Warsaw”—that person is more valuable than 100 business plan competitions or TechCrunch features.

What you should actually do: Start now. Start before you need to raise. Start before you even have a company. Go to founder dinners, investor events, accelerators. Ask for intros to investors you admire. Have coffee with other founders doing similar things (even if they’re not competitors, because they’re not yet). Build relationships with people who’ve raised before. Understand how capital moves through your city or region.

The network you build at 25 will get you your first check at 27. It will get your co-founder at 29. It will get you your Series A at 32. It will get you your exit at 35. And it will get your portfolio companies capital when you become an angel at 40.

Protect your network like it’s your cap table. Because it is.

Lesson 4: Board Meetings Become More Important Than They Seem.

In year one, board meetings will feel like a formality. You’ll show up, update the investors, answer a few questions, leave. You’ll wonder why they even matter.

By year five, you’ll realize that board meetings are where investor sentiment shifts. It’s not the company metrics that matter most—it’s how the board interprets them. If your CAC is $500 and payback is 14 months, the board will either say, “We should invest in sales” or “This unit economics problem is fatal.” Same metric. Different interpretation. Different outcome.

The mistake you’ll make: You’ll assume that if the metrics are good, the board will support you. You’ll show up unprepared, assume the data speaks for itself, and you’ll be shocked when an investor raises a concern you didn’t anticipate. You’ll take it personally. You’ll think it’s about you and your competence. Usually it’s not. It’s about narrative.

What you should actually do: Treat board meetings like you’d treat a customer pitch. Prepare a narrative. Not a story (that’s what amateurs do). A narrative: here’s where we were, here’s what we did, here’s what changed, here’s where we’re going. Frame the metrics within that narrative. Pre-brief one investor before the meeting, anticipate objections, come prepared with answers.

The board that seems like an albatross early in your process becomes a psychological lifeline in difficult months. They can’t always fix your problems. But they can reframe them, which sometimes matters more.

Lesson 5: The Best Terms Are Often the Hardest to Negotiate.

You’ll notice something strange around year four: the founders raising the most favorable terms are not the ones with the most use. They’re the ones willing to walk away.

An investor says, “We’ll give you $1M at a $5M valuation, but we need a board seat and veto rights on hiring.” A founder with other options says, “Thank you, no. We have other conversations. When you’re ready to talk, we’re here.”

Then, three months later, the investor calls back. “We’ll do the round at $8M with a standard SAFE.”

That shift doesn’t happen because the company got better. It happens because scarcity shifted. You became the scarce asset instead of the capital being scarce.

The mistake you’ll make: You’ll accept the first term sheet because it feels like a miracle. You’ll worry that if you negotiate too hard, the investor will walk. You’ll lock in bad terms because you needed the capital and the investor seemed sure.

Then, in year two, when those terms matter (during the Series A or M&A), you’ll realize how much of your company you gave away for the safety of knowing the money was coming.

What you should actually do: Never accept the first term sheet without shopping it. Not because you want to game the investor—because you want to understand the market. If three investors are willing to do the same round, you have information that the terms are reasonable. If only one investor will do it, either that investor sees something others don’t (good reason to accept), or you haven’t found your market fit yet (good reason to wait).

The hardest negotiation is the one where you’re willing to be right instead of funded. You’ll do that once, and it will hurt. You’ll run out of money, you’ll panic, you’ll wish you’d taken the bad terms. Then, you’ll raise at better terms somewhere else, and you’ll understand why saying no was the right move.

Lesson 6: Failure Is Retrainable. Burnout Is Not.

You’ll have a company that fails. It might be your first one. It might be your third. But at some point, you’ll be in a room with your co-founder and realize: this is not working. The market doesn’t want this. We’ve tried everything we know. We’re out of ideas and out of runway.

And you’ll make a choice: do we raise more money and try to pivot, or do we shut down?

The smartest decision you’ll make in your career is knowing the difference between “this business model is wrong” and “I’m too tired to see the right business model.”

The mistake you’ll make: You’ll confuse the two. You’ll be exhausted, demoralized, and burning out, and you’ll interpret that as “the business is broken.” You’ll shut down a company that might have been savable. Or you’ll raise more money because you’re not ready to admit defeat, burn more capital, hurt more people, and eventually shut it down anyway—but from a worse position.

What you should actually do: When a company is failing, ask yourself: am I failing because the market doesn’t want this, or because I’m too tired to see what to do next? If it’s the latter, take a month off. Seriously. Step back. Get distance. Sleep. Then ask the question again.

If it’s the former, shut it down. Quickly. Cleanly. Tell your team the truth. Tell your investors the truth. Tell your customers the truth. Apologize if you need to. Then close it and move on.

The companies that destroy founders are not the ones that fail fast. They’re the ones that fail slowly while the founder tries harder and harder, burning out, burning through capital, burning bridges with investors.

By year 15, you’ll be mentoring founders who are heading toward burnout-driven failure, and you’ll recognize the signs because you’ve seen them in yourself: the founder who keeps saying “next month we’ll have traction,” the one who’s working 80-hour weeks and getting worse results, the one who’s afraid to talk to investors about the reality of the situation.

Burnout is the silent killer. Failure is just data.

Lesson 7: Your Co-Founder Is More Important Than Your Pitch.

The best investors will tell you that they invest in the team, not the idea. You’ll hear that, nod, and think, “Yeah, team is important. Got it.”

Then you’ll live through a product failure, a market shift, or a hard pivot. And you’ll realize: the only reason you survived that is because your co-founder was still in the room with you, thinking the same way, willing to try the next thing.

If you’d been alone, the company would have died. Or worse: you would have.

The mistake you’ll make: You’ll be a founder who cares deeply about the idea and loosely about the co-founder. You’ll think, “I can hire a CEO later” or “They’re good now but I’m not sure they can scale.” You’ll not invest enough energy in the relationship. You’ll let the partnership atrophy while you’re focused on the business.

Then one day you’ll look at your cap table and realize: the person who’s been here every day, who knows the business better than you do, who’s saved you a dozen times from decisions that would have been catastrophic—you’ve been taking them for granted. And you’re worried they’ll leave.

What you should actually do: Invest in your co-founder relationship like it’s your most important customer relationship. Because it is. Weekly one-on-ones, not around metrics, but around how they’re doing, what they’re worried about, what they need. Be honest about disagreements instead of pretending they don’t exist. Disagree fast and commit fully.

The co-founder relationship is the foundation of the company. If the foundation is cracked, nothing you build on top of it will last.

I’ve watched companies with great ideas and weak co-founder relationships fail. I’ve watched companies with mediocre ideas and strong co-founder relationships thrive. The team bet wins every time.

Lesson 8: Fundraising Speed Compounds Over a Career.

Here’s a pattern you’ll notice around year eight: founders who raise quickly raise more capital over their lifetime than founders who raise deliberately.

This seems counterintuitive. Shouldn’t the founders who are careful and thoughtful about each round raise better terms?

Sometimes. But mostly, the advantage goes to founders who raise efficiently. Here’s why:

A founder who can close a seed round in 4 weeks has 2 extra months of runway to build. Those 2 months of traction become a stronger Series A pitch. The stronger Series A pitch gets better terms and faster close. The extra speed and terms compound into Series B.

A founder who carefully considers each investor conversation might get marginally better terms, but they use 6 months to close the same round. In those 6 months, they lose 2 months of building. The weaker traction becomes a weaker Series A. The weaker Series A begets a weaker Series B.

Over 10 years, the compounding of speed difference between the two founders is enormous. One has raised 5 rounds in 10 years. The other has raised 4. One has had 2 extra years of building because they moved faster. One has built at better momentum because they were never running behind the runway cliff.

The mistake you’ll make: You’ll optimize for the best term sheet on the current round instead of optimizing for speed. You’ll negotiate for 6 weeks to get a 0.5% better valuation, not understanding that you’re trading away the upside of faster building.

What you should actually do: Get 80% of the best possible terms fast, instead of 100% of the best terms slowly. Understand what terms are table stakes (control, governance, leakage), and optimize those. Accept that you’re not going to get the perfect valuation. Get a good one and move.

Fast founders outcompete careful founders because time is the scarcest resource in a startup. Spend it on the company, not on negotiating with investors.

By year 20, this pattern will be so obvious to you that you’ll cringe at how much time young founders waste in late-stage term negotiations over stuff that won’t matter if the company succeeds.

Lesson 9: Playing the Game vs. Building the Thing (The Hardest Tradeoff)

At some point in your second company, you’ll have a choice: you can spend this month optimizing your pitch to raise capital, or you can spend this month building a feature your customers have asked for ten times.

This choice is the cruelest part of fundraising. Because the game and the thing are not aligned.

Playing the game means: investor meetings, pitch rehearsal, building a financial model, refining your narrative, talking to LPs, networking at events. It means looking good. It means being available. It means crafting a story that’s compelling.

Building the thing means: sitting with your head down, solving customer problems, learning whether the market actually wants what you’re building, iterating on product, shipping faster, staying silent until you have proof.

These two are in competition for your time. And they feel like they’re in competition for your soul, because one requires you to be humble and the other requires you to be confident.

The mistake you’ll make: You’ll get good at the game. You’ll become a charismatic founder. You’ll raise a lot of capital. You’ll be on stages talking about your vision. And you’ll look up one day and realize: the company isn’t as far along as the story I’ve been telling. My team knows the story is aspirational. My investors are starting to figure it out. I’m three months away from having to answer difficult questions about why my unit economics don’t match my projections.

What you should actually do: Spend 80% of your time building the thing. 20% playing the game. When it’s time to raise, move to 50/50 for a focused period (6-8 weeks). Then return to 80/20.

The founders who win are the ones who are better at building than at pitching. Because building creates the data. And data beats story every time.

The hardest lesson is realizing that you need both. You can’t just build. But you also can’t just pitch. You need to do both, but you need to sequence them right.

Lesson 10: Your Co-Founder Is More Important Than Your Pitch. (Wait, I Already Said That, But Here’s the Part I Didn’t Say.)

Remember lesson 7? Where I said your co-founder is more important than your pitch?

This is the part of that lesson that nobody talks about, because it’s uncomfortable.

You’re going to get tired. Not just tired from work—tired from the weight of making decisions. Tired from the weight of knowing that if you make the wrong call, 20 people lose their jobs. Tired from the weight of raising capital and having to convince people you have all the answers when you don’t.

In those moments, the person who saves you is not an investor. It’s not a board member. It’s your co-founder.

They’ll be the person who says, “You’re not crazy. The market is just hard.” They’ll be the person who says, “We should shut this down” when you’re too close to see it. They’ll be the person who says, “I’ll do the hardest part while you rest.”

And here’s the thing nobody tells you: sometimes that person will be you for them. Sometimes your co-founder will be falling apart and you’ll have to hold the vision. You’ll have to be the one who says, “I believe in this.” You’ll have to carry both of you.

This is not a business function. This is a human function. And it’s why co-founder relationships are so important. Because fundraising is lonely. Building is lonely. And the only person who’s lonely in the same way, at the same time, is your co-founder.

The part you need to know: You cannot do this alone. Not because you’re not capable. Because you’re human. And humans are not built to carry uncertainty for years on end.

I’ve watched brilliant founders burn out alone. I’ve watched mediocre founders thrive because they had someone to share the weight with.

Pick a co-founder you respect, trust, and genuinely like. Everything else flows from that.

Lesson 11 (The One I Almost Forgot): What Founders Never Talk About—The Loneliness of Decision-Making

I’m going to tell you something that almost no founder admits in public.

You’re going to sit in meetings and make decisions that affect people’s lives. You’ll decide whether to keep the company going or shut it down. You’ll decide whether to pivot or stick. You’ll decide whether to hire this person or not. You’ll decide whether to fire someone you care about because the business requires it.

And you’ll make these decisions alone.

Not literally alone—you’ll have a co-founder, advisors, investors, board members. But when it comes time to make the call, it’s on you. The weight of it is on you.

And nobody talks about how heavy that is.

Here’s what I wish someone told me at 25: the loneliness is not a sign that you’re doing something wrong. It’s a sign that you’re actually leading. Leaders are the ones who have to make calls that other people are afraid to make. That’s what makes you a leader. And that’s what makes you lonely.

You’ll get good at hiding it. You’ll show up to investor meetings with confidence. You’ll tell your team everything is fine. You’ll talk to advisors about strategy. But late at night, you’ll be awake, thinking about the decision you just made and whether it was right.

Sometimes it will be right. Sometimes it will be catastrophically wrong. Most of the time, you won’t know for months.

The thing that saves you: You’ll find that other founders understand this in a way nobody else can. You’ll have coffee with someone building something else, and you’ll talk about the loneliness, and they’ll tell you about their own 3 AM decisions, and suddenly you’ll feel less alone.

This is why founder community matters so much. It’s not about networking or deal flow (though those are real). It’s about knowing that other people are carrying the same weight, making the same kinds of impossible decisions, feeling the same kind of loneliness.

By year ten, you’ll be the person giving that gift to other founders. You’ll listen to their impossible decisions. You’ll tell them about your own failures. You’ll help them feel less alone.

That reciprocal gift is one of the most valuable parts of this life.

What I Got Wrong

I want to be honest about something: not all of my instincts were right.

I underestimated the value of taking things slow. I was so focused on speed compounding that I didn’t understand that some decisions benefit from time. Getting married. Building a deep team. Learning a market. I rushed, and some of those decisions I’d reverse if I could.

I overestimated the importance of valuation. I cared too much about getting the “right” valuation on my seed round. What I should have cared about was: does this investor believe in me? Can we work together? Can I take their money and ignore them if I need to, or will this relationship become a distraction? Valuation matters, but relationship fit matters more.

I underestimated how much my mental health would affect my business decisions. There were months where I was depressed, burned out, or just tired, and I made business decisions from that place instead of from clarity. I thought that was just part of being a founder. It wasn’t. I should have taken breaks. Should have gotten help. Should have been more honest with my co-founders about how I was really doing.

I overestimated how much investors know. I deferred to investor judgment for years, assuming that because they’d seen more, they knew better. Some of them did. Many of them were just confidently repeating patterns they’d seen before, missing the specific context of my situation. I should have trusted myself more.

I underestimated how much my network would matter later. The people I met at 27, the investors I worked with at 30, the founders I had coffee with at 35—many of them are still in my circle. The network compounds in ways you can’t predict. I should have invested in it even more deliberately.

The Synthesis: Why This Letter Matters Now

You’re 25, and you think fundraising is about finding money. You’re about to learn that it’s about finding partners.

You’re going to raise capital across a continent, across boom and bust, across multiple companies. You’re going to be a founder, then an investor, then both. You’re going to understand the game from both sides.

And you’re going to realize that the game is not about winning rounds. It’s about building something that matters, with people who care, in a way that compounds over decades.

The best rounds I raised were not the ones with the best terms. They were the ones where the investor said, “I believe in you. What do you need?” The worst rounds were the ones where I optimized for valuation and got a partner who didn’t actually trust me.

The companies I’m proudest of are not the ones that raised the most capital. They’re the ones where we stayed true to what we were building, even when the fundraising was hard.

And the career I’m proud of—the exits, the angel investments, the book, the mentorship of founders—that only became possible because I learned these lessons. Not from books. Not from podcasts. From living them. From failing. From getting back up. From understanding that fundraising is not the game; building is the game. Fundraising is just the tool that lets you keep building.

Here’s what I want you to know, 25-year-old Lech:

You’re going to be okay. You’re going to raise capital. You’re going to build companies. You’re going to fail. You’re going to feel lonely and terrified and exhilarated and devastated.

And through it all, you’re going to understand something that most people never figure out: that the privilege of building something that didn’t exist before, with people who believe in it, in a way that compounds over time—that’s the actual point.

The capital is just the vehicle.

Stay patient with yourself. Trust your instincts more. Be honest with the people around you. Pick co-founders you love. Raise capital because you need to build, not because you want to prove something.

And remember: the best time to build your network is before you need it. The best time to understand investors is before you’re asking them for money. The best time to learn what you’re capable of is when the stakes are still small.

You’ve got this. Even when you don’t.

Lech Kaniuk
April 11, 2026

A Letter to You, 25-Year-Old You, From 25-Year-Old Me Who Listened

If you’re reading this and you’re 25, or 30, or 35 and about to raise for the first time—I want to tell you: these lessons are real. They’re not theoretical. They’re lived.

And they’re going to hurt. Because learning them means failing. Means making decisions you’ll regret. Means raising capital on bad terms and understanding it later. Means prioritizing the pitch when you should have been building.

But that pain is the cost of the education. And the education is what makes you a real founder.

You don’t need to learn all these lessons. You can learn some of them faster by listening. But the ones that stick are the ones you live.

So here’s my advice: fail forward. Fail fast. Fail with a co-founder. And then get back up and build something.

Internal Linking Suggestions

FAQ: What Every Founder Should Know About Raising Money

{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "FAQPage",
  "mainEntity": [
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "What's more important: a great idea or a strong co-founder?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Co-founder. Ideas change. Markets shift. Products pivot. But the person next to you through all of that is irreplaceable. Investors invest in the team, not the idea. Pick a co-founder you trust, respect, and genuinely like."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "Should I negotiate hard on valuation or accept terms quickly?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Accept good terms quickly. Spend extra time negotiating on governance, control, and leakage (anti-dilution, vesting, etc.). Valuation matters less than speed and the quality of the relationship with your investor. Fast fundraising compounds over your career."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How do I know if I should shut down my company or keep going?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "Ask yourself: is this company failing because the market doesn't want it, or because I'm too tired to see the next move? If it's the latter, take a month off. If it's the former, shut it down quickly and cleanly. Burnout is the killer, not failure."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "How much time should I spend on fundraising versus building?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "80% building, 20% fundraising during normal periods. During an active raise, move to 50/50 for 6-8 weeks, then return to 80/20. The companies that win are built by founders who are better at building than pitching."
      }
    },
    {
      "@type": "Question",
      "name": "Is it better to have one investor who knows you or ten who are being courted?",
      "acceptedAnswer": {
        "@type": "Answer",
        "text": "One investor who believes in you and will support you in hard times is worth ten investors who just followed the herd. Quality of relationship matters more than quantity of capital. Pick investors you want to work with, not just investors who will write checks."
      }
    }
  ]
}

Implementation Notes: Applying These Lessons to Your Fundraising Process

If you’re about to raise for the first time:

Pick a co-founder you genuinely respect. This decision matters more than the market opportunity.
Build your network before you need it. Have 10 coffee dates before you ask for intros to investors.
Understand that fundraising will take longer and be harder than you think. Plan for 6 months, hope for 3.
Decide which terms are table stakes (governance, control) and which are negotiable (valuation).

If you’re in the middle of a raise:

Track your energy, not just your pipeline. If you’re burning out, your decision-making will suffer.
Talk to your co-founder every day about how you’re really doing, not just about metrics.
Say yes to good investors faster. Don’t optimize for perfect terms.
Remember that the investor relationship matters more than any single term.

If you’ve raised before and you’re raising again:

Use your pattern recognition from the first raise. Most of the fear is just repetition.
Move faster this time. You know the game now.
Be more honest with investors about what you don’t know.
Help other founders deal with their first raise. You’ll understand your own process better by teaching it.

Author: Lech Kaniuk
Published: April 11, 2026
Reading Time: 18 minutes
Series: The Final Article of “13 Weeks of Fundraising Wisdom”
Topics: Founder Advice, Startup Lessons, Personal Essay, Career Reflection

Up Next

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Should I start a company immediately or work somewhere first?

Work 2-3 years first. You learn how big companies operate, why they move slowly, what employees actually want. You build network. You get capital to bootstrap. Starting at 25 with no experience is possible but harder. Starting at 28 with 3 years of market knowledge is easier. Time invested in learning > time invested in starting early.

Q: How do I know if my idea is actually worth pursuing?

Talk to 20 customers first. If 15 say “I’d pay for this,” pursue it. If fewer than 10 say yes, find a new idea. Don’t fall in love with your idea. Fall in love with the problem. Lots of smart founders picked wrong problems. Problem validation is 10x more important than idea execution.

Q: Is it worth raising venture capital or should I bootstrap?

Bootstrap if your business could hit $100K MRR in 2 years without capital. Raise VC if your market requires 10+ years of investment to win. SaaS SMB tools? Bootstrap. Marketplace competing with Facebook? Raise VC. Evaluate based on competitive dynamics, not on “I want to be a startup founder.”

Q: How do I choose between staying with a co-founder who’s struggling vs. making them leave?

Red flags: they stop showing up, they undermine your leadership, they’re not shipping. Green flags: they’re learning, they own their role, you trust their judgment. You’re together 10 hours/week. You can outlast bad cofounder decisions longer than you think. But don’t wait more than 6 months to make the call.

Q: What would have accelerated your path most?

Starting a company sooner, shipping faster, raising more capital earlier, and being ruthless about who I surrounded myself with. I spent too much time optimizing ideas and not enough time validating with customers. I picked co-founders based on friendship, not complementary skills. I delayed fundraising because I was scared. All of these would have compressed timeline 2-3 years.

Founder Intuition: The pattern recognition and judgment founders develop through repeating cycles of building, pitching, raising, and shipping. Founder intuition is most valuable for identifying problems, spotting co-founder fit, and reading investors. Intuition is learnable. You build it through repetition and honest feedback, not through coaching or reading.

From the books

This guide expands on ideas from Aniol w Piekle.

Read free chapters →

Related essays

More on raising capital

Share X LinkedIn